Bank Valuations a Headache For Many KZN Estate Agents

Posted On Monday, 29 October 2012 09:21 Published by eProp@News
Rate this item
(0 votes)

The banks’ valuations often reflect the way in which their client is rated by their criteria rather than the true market value of the property. This can have many negative implications for both buyers and sellers...

Gregory Senftleben

Much coverage in the property media has recently been given to the difficulties experienced by would-be home buyers in obtaining bonds. However, says Gregory Senftleben, Rawson Properties franchisee for the Umhlanga precinct, in his experience another problem almost as frequently encountered is the valuation of property by the banks vs market value.

"We have just recently," he said, "had a case in which we had an offer on a beachfront home at R2,1 million – but the bank valued it at R1,8 million. When we asked the bank about this, it became clear that their valuation was based on inaccurate information and that no onsite valuation had been done. After providing them with correct information and insisting that an onsite valuation be carried out, they finally raised their value to R1,9 million. This helped but did not eliminate the problem because there was still a substantial discrepancy between our valuation and that of the bank – which, understandably, caused the buyer to lose confidence in the property and consider withdrawing his offer.

"We were, however, able to convince him of the accuracy of our valuation by bringing in an independent valuer – whose figure was similar to ours – and then forwarding this written valuation to the client and the bank. This incident," said Sentfleben, "is by no means the only one he has had to deal with and although bringing in another valuer is an effective tactic, it has to be said that it is also an expensive one. Furthermore, the disagreements on valuations can, and in this case did, cause his staff and the client to go through an emotional rollercoaster ride for some weeks. Fortunately, however, in this case the purchaser was willing and able to cover the differential by increasing his deposit."

"This incident highlights the true nature of the problem, namely that banks are in many cases over-cautious in the implementation of their lending criteria for bond applicants and are, therefore, not willing to accept that the market has adjusted itself. Banks need to realize that buyers today inform themselves very adequately concerning property prices and, when an offer is made, it is seldom done in ignorance but only after careful comparison of the properties available in the marketplace. Offers are, therefore, truly 'market-related' in every sense."

Last modified on Wednesday, 12 March 2014 15:48

Most Popular

Alexander Swart Property Group: Cape Town’s Residential Property Values still the best in SA

May 25, 2019
 BBA 1
A survey recently carried out by the respected property analysts, Lightstone, has…

Dipula Holding steady in tough trading conditions

May 22, 2019
JSE diversified REIT, Dipula Income Fund (Dipula), today announced steady interim results…

Lucid launches SA’s newest hotel brand Home* Suite Hotels

May 22, 2019
Lucid Ventures, the R350M Cape Town based Hotel Fund, this week announced the launch of…

Tradehold shows resilience in demanding markets

May 24, 2019
In the year to February, 2019 Tradehold, with property interests split between southern…

EPP and Echo Investment awarded for Towarowa 22 plans

May 21, 2019
EPP, Poland’s largest owner of shopping malls and its partner Echo Investment, the…

Please publish modules in offcanvas position.